That is what we do at our school. For about the last 4 years. The thought was that we would actually attract more families to our district if we did so. It didn’t work. Our small district is stiil going through declining enrollment, and has been working, successfully I must add, through this for the last 12 years. We’ve been good at cutting the budget, working with what money we have, and planning for the upcoming cuts, all the way through. I am one of the teachers, headed the teachers association for many years, and was completely involved, and still am, with the process. Yes there were years when we didn’t get much in our paychecks, but we are still solvent and forging ahead. All of that lead to the idea of all day K. I was, and am, against the idea. We did not attract anyone to our district just because of it. One still has to be able to buy a house here, which is an expensive proposition, or rent a place, which is a scarce and expensive proposition, or get an interdistrict transfer to our district. We live in snow country, and we typically don’t get many transfers. So, what about all day K? Besides the completely off the wall hope of people moving here for it, literature was produced espousing the joys of extended time in the classroom, more teaching at a more leisurely pace and so on. Prior to the all day K, we has am and pm sessions. One group would show up at 8, stay till 1130, the other group would come at 1230 and leave at 315ish. For each session we had two credentialled teachers for the 25-30 students, plus a one hour aide, and often a parent helper. Small groups (three each day) were alway taught by the teachers, with one non-academic group taught by the aide or parent, with tutoring done by any of us. Every day there were at least two teachers in the room. A lot of teaching for the time periods. For 4-5 years old children, turning 5-6, this matched their attention spans. It was a rich enviornment. Along came the 20 to 1 student teacher ratio, and all day K. Now the children, the same 4-5 years olds turning 5-6, show up at 9 and leave at 315. There is one teacher in the room, and one aide, one hour a day, and sometimes a parent volunteer. Mostly, it’s just me and my aide. Small groups, three at a time, are now taught by me, my aide, with an independent group monitored by the two of us. In the afternoon, the groups, all three of them, or two of them, or if possible one large group, is done by me. We lost a great deal of actual teaching time doing this. We gained nothing. The math is pretty simple. By the 90th day of school my class has completed the entire mass of minutes that we use to do in 180 days of am/pm, with no preceptible gain. The children are fried by this point. Now, to be fair, there are a lot of folks who think all day K does something wonderful for very young children. Just do a google or yahoo seach on “all day kindergarten” and you’ll come up with a great deal of information. In the 21 years I’ve been teaching Kindergarten, I simply think that it is fundamentally wrong to structure a young child’s day in this manner. We do provide parents with all day care for their Kindergartners, which may be a benefit to them. I just have to wonder when these children will burn out on school, starting off which such a long day, in addition to any pre-school they may have had. When do they get to be children, learning the ways of the universe by free play and interacting in an unstructured, childhood manner? The National Association for the Education of Young Children is an excellent place to look for infomation regarding this and all issues about educating our children.
Any thoughts on this out there?